Hafeez revealed his discussion with Rizwan after the redundancy and emphasized the need for conclusive substantiation to capsize on- field judges' opinions.
The alternate Test between Pakistan and Australia was marred by contentious umpiring opinions that sparked contestation during Pakistan's pursuit of palm on Friday.
The match took a controversial turn during Mohammad Rizwan's redundancy , leaving the wicketkeeper- batsman visibly stunned. The pivotal moment passed in the 61st over of Pakistan's alternate innings when Pat Cummins appealed for a caught behind against Rizwan. originally dismissed by the on- field arbiter, Cummins decided for a review suspecting a possible glove touch by Rizwan.
Upon review, the third arbiter anatomized multiple angles and detected a shaft as the ball passed the wrist band, leading to a reversal of the on- field decision. still, the hotspot technology failed to display any mark as Rizwan turned down from the ball at the pivotal moment.
Hafeez, speaking in thepost-match presser, revealed his discussion with Rizwan after the redundancy and emphasized the need for conclusive substantiation to capsize on- field judges' opinions. " I spoke to Rizwan, and I believe he's a veritably honest person.
He told me that the ball didn't touch anywhere near the gloves, and there should be conclusive substantiation to capsize the decision of the on- field arbiter. Grounded on what I know, the arbiter gave it not out, and there was no conclusive substantiation for the decision to be capsized. I do not know what further to say. In this case, the technology turned out to be a curse rather than commodity helpful," Hafeez said. It's worth noting that Australia settled the palm by dismissing the callers for 237 runs in their alternate innings, leaving Pakistan falling short of the 317- run target set by the hosts.
0 Comments